Hi Jim more on evolution?

[neo]

Ciao I hope you are doing well

I looked at the Visser froum and there is your article mentioned by Frank.
Now, you kow perhaps that even Karl Popper wrote than Darwin´s research project was a metaphysical one, becasue it couldn´t be refuted (according to his methodological canon of hypothesis-deductive process in research). So calling KW metaphysician is of course not mistake , but we also should include nobel Prize in medecine 1965, Jacques Monod´s book "Hazard and necessity", the classical apology of randomness and reductionism as well, because his position is not based on a rigorous scientifical claim but a political one - but more like a scientistic and atheistic credo which has obviously reached world domination today.

Up to today, nobody in hard sciences can show up the mechanism (if we have to use such boring a term) explaining the passage (processes) from non-living to living organisms. There are only metaphysical speculations.

That doesn´t mean either qualifying the intelligent design freaks to bullshit around.